[rescue] Help w/ computer time??

[Steve Sandau]

I am all for having the best implementation of something, and I
appreciate having scripts be as efficient as possible. What you say may
even be right. However, you could easily have achieved exactly what you
said you wanted to achieve and been *far* less obnoxious.

I didn't notice anything about Jonathan's posting that claimed it was
authoritative. Most take a response as a suggestion. This isn't a class.
We offer ideas back and forth as equals, more or less. ;) As far as
complexity, it was certainly more complex than most of us could/would
respond to. Chill out.

Adding to, correcting, or clarifyling another's posting without being an
asshole about it is a very useful skill. ;)

Steve

"Greg A. Woods" wrote:
> 
> [ On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 14:31:54 (-0500), Bill Bradford wrote: ]
> > Subject: Re: [rescue] Help w/ computer time??
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:28:55PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > > > for i in `cat filename` ; do
> > > >   echo -n $i ' '
> > > >   echo $i | gawk '{print strftime("%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Z %Y", $1)}'
> > > > done
> > > I really hate to do this, but you're _really_ asking for it these days:
> > > That's such horrible inefficient and poorly designed code it almost made
> > > me puke no my keyboard!  (well not literally, but it's sure making me
> > > spew my thoughts through my keyboard and into this message! :-)
> >
> > *SO*?  *IT WORKS*.  Who *cares* if it isnt efficient or beautiful or
> > doesent meet the Greg Woods Coding Standard?  Its a FOUR LINE SCRIPT.
> 
> Actually, depending on the data set, it won't work -- it'll bomb rather
> badly.
> 
> Also, depending on how often it is needed, it'll be slower than molasses
> at the South Pole (in any month!  ;-).  (maybe not slower than doing the
> same thing with a perl invocation per value, though  :-)
> 
> > Greg, get a GRIP.  If you have to worry about a four-line quickie
> > script
> 
> Such so-called "four-line quickies" have been the bane of my working
> life as a programmer primarily maintaining other people's code....
> 
> People who authoritatively profer such ill thought out examples without
> having even the slightest clue about the un-stated requirements and
> without apparently even thinking about the inherent limitations of their
> creations, and especially when they do so on a public mailing list where
> they may be innocently picked up and used by other naive and perhaps
> "unintended" recipients, really do need to be corrected.  The sooner I
> can get a better implementation on record in the same forum the less
> likely it'll be that I'll have to fix it in some lame code I encounter
> some day in the future.  This very same kind of nonsense has happened
> far to often in my real life to just call it deja vu or bad juju....
> 
> It's not like this is a complex problem either -- Jon broke almost every
> rule of thumb for writing good shell scripts with that one!
> 
> > you SERIOUSLY need a vacation.
> 
> That's be nice, but I don't think it's that serious....  :-)
> 
> --
>                                                                 Greg A. Woods
> 
> +1 416 218-0098;  <gwoods at acm.org>;  <g.a.woods at ieee.org>;  <woods at robohack.ca>
> Planix, Inc. <woods at planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods at weird.com>
> _______________________________________________
> rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue

-- 
Steve Sandau
IS Technician, TMA Bath, Maine
ssandau at bath.tmac.com