On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 01:12:20PM -0500, nick at snowman.net wrote: > lacks a maintainer for *SPARC* not ultrasparc. Ultrasparc has a > maintainer (though I forget who). sparc works fairly well (my quad > hypersparc is running quite nicely). Does the 2.4 kernel take good advantage of the multi processors? -- Joshua D. Boyd