[rescue] web server loadbalancing...

Fri Aug 3 05:58:40 CDT 2001

On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Greg A. Woods wrote:

> Not to mention but use of RR DNS also enforces at least a 300 second
> interval between changes that can be propogated out to clients too
> (minimum TTL honoured by any RFC-conforming DNS cache is 300s).

Huh? Not that it really matters, but where in the RFCs did you find this
information? I know that BIND did/does ignore TTLs under 300 but not that
this was required by the standard.

//cjs