[geeks] [rescue] SMF confuseth me still

[Phil Stracchino]

On 09/25/17 19:04, William Enestvedt wrote:
> Well, my train of thought was around a service that hadn't completed starting
> yet formally, even though functionally it was online.
> 
> Like if there's a service that requires a file on an NFS share or something,
> where a timeout is pretty long, but the rest of the features are available.
> 
> But the verbose output of SMF would be handy, as well as the log file for that
> facility (service). 'svcs -xv' should say something useful, if memory serves.

Nothing enlightening, unfortunately.  'Exited with status 0.'  And the
exact same command run interactively starts the service daemon just fine.


-- 
  Phil Stracchino
  Babylon Communications
  phils at caerllewys.net
  phil at co.ordinate.org
  Landline: +1.603.293.8485
  Mobile:   +1.603.998.6958