[geeks] geeks Digest, Vol 86, Issue 11
Lionel Peterson
lionel4287 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 23 18:05:31 CST 2010
On Jan 21, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Phil Stracchino <alaric at metrocast.net>
wrote:
> ...Or maybe just had the foresight to plan it ahead of need instead of
> leaving it until the last possible OMGWTFBBQ-desperate moment and
> having
> to pay a premium rush price for whatever they could get?
Leaving money on the table waiting for it to be spent "several months
later" commits the assets to a future use and prevents other
profitable uses during those "several months".
Funding from the state though "promised" "committed," or "guaranteed"
isn't always... And borrowing money for a public institution is non-
trivial.
Here in NJ school districts were told 2 years ago to expect increases
in funding contributions from the state for the next 5 years, flash-
forward to today, and smart districts are planning for a significant
reduction in aid from the state with no corresponding reduction in any
mandates, requirements or even increased flexibility in re-figuring
their budget allocations.
Lionel
More information about the geeks
mailing list