[geeks] Well, THAT was a setback
Jonathan Patschke
jp at celestrion.net
Tue Jan 19 06:53:03 CST 2010
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, gsm at mendelson.com wrote:
> BTW, just for the record 1000BaseT is not 1000 megabits per second ethernet.
> It's four 250meg connections operating in parallel.
It's 1000 megabits/s, just not 1000MHz.
> I also have no idea of what happens when one of the connections stops
> working, do you loose them all, or does it just slow down?
It's no-longer 1000baseT, then. A reasonable controller will attempt to
renegotiate at 100baseTX.
--
Jonathan Patschke ) "Science is what we understand well enough to explain
Elgin, TX ( to a computer. Art is everything else we do."
USA ) --Dr. Donald Knuth
More information about the geeks
mailing list