[geeks] Well, THAT was a setback

Jonathan Patschke jp at celestrion.net
Tue Jan 19 06:53:03 CST 2010


On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, gsm at mendelson.com wrote:

> BTW, just for the record 1000BaseT is not 1000 megabits per second ethernet.
> It's four 250meg connections operating in parallel.

It's 1000 megabits/s, just not 1000MHz.

> I also have no idea of what happens when one of the connections stops
> working, do you loose them all, or does it just slow down?

It's no-longer 1000baseT, then.  A reasonable controller will attempt to
renegotiate at 100baseTX.

-- 
Jonathan Patschke  ) "Science is what we understand well enough to explain
Elgin, TX         (   to a computer.  Art is everything else we do."
USA                )                                    --Dr. Donald Knuth



More information about the geeks mailing list