[geeks] memtest86 question (are correctable ECC errors, errors?)
Jonathan C. Patschke
jp at celestrion.net
Wed Sep 26 02:45:08 CDT 2007
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
>> If anything, this illustrates why ECC should be a mandatory
>> requirement for anything other than a gaming/media-playback system.
>
> Parity was standard in PC type computers until RAM being $50 a
> megabyte prevented people from buying Windows.
Yeah, but regular parity memory wasn't nearly as useful as ECC/SECDED.
It just halted the system when it found a one-bit error, and wouldn't
even see errors of multiple numbers of bits.
> Compaq to stoped using parity RAM which cut memory costs by about 11%.
>
> Apple NEVER used parity RAM except for some IIcx/IIci systems sold to
> the U.S. Millitary.
And the IIfx, IIRC. I always gave them (and their customers) grief
about the lack of parity memory.
I'll gladly pay a premium for ECC on any machine I care about; memory's
cheap enough these days, and virtually every memory controller on the
market supports it.
--
Jonathan Patschke ) "So far, 99% of illegal activity has been caused
Elgin, TX ( by criminals."
USA ) --David Willis
More information about the geeks
mailing list