[geeks] Network Slowness
Sridhar Ayengar
ploopster at gmail.com
Thu May 24 13:13:26 CDT 2007
Doug McLaren wrote:
> | > I work for a company that makes network backup software for virtual
> | > machines, I've done every test under the sun for checking network
> | > throughput :) You will almost never see more than 20 MB/s on
> | > SSH/SCP/SFTP transfers, not matter how fast your media is.
> |
> | Anyway, I'd be happy with 20MB/s. I'm getting *5*.
>
> Then try another protocol. ftp, rsh/rcp, smb, etc. The nc example
> you were given is excellent -- it even removes disk I/O as a
> bottleneck.
>
> Don't blame the hardware or OSs until you've tried something that's
> not encrypted. They are absolutely right -- ssh can't keep up with
> local network speeds, even on the fastest hardware. This HPN SCP
> stuff is interesting, though it looks like a lot of their speed
> increase also comes from using the `none' encryption method (which
> should greatly reduce cpu as a bottleneck.)
But I've gotten faster speeds on (100Mbps) FDDI *with identical
encryption turned on*. I seriously doubt my FDDI hardware performs any
hardware acceleration of SSH encryption.
These machines are *ridiculously* fast. I get twice the rate with SFTP
transfers over 100Mbps ethernet at work on machines which are an order
of magnitude slower.
The only differences I can spot between the setup at work and the setup
at home are that I'm using a HP Procurve gigabit switch at home, whereas
at work I have a Cisco 2950-24, and the machines at work (correctly)
autoconfigure themselves to 100BASE-TX instead of the 1000BASE-T I have
at home.
Peace... Sridhar
More information about the geeks
mailing list