[geeks] recommended dual channel LVD controller, PC
Phil Stracchino
alaric at caerllewys.net
Sat Jul 24 14:12:05 CDT 2004
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 03:08:30PM -0400, Andrew Weiss wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2004, at 3:12 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> >This is 1+0 (mirrored, then striped):
> >
> >{ [0 1] [2 3] [4 5] [6 7] [8 9] [a b] [c d] [e f] }
> >
> >If one disk fails, one subunit will lose its mirror, but the array now
> >looks like this:
> >
> >{ [_ 1] [2 3] [4 5] [6 7] [8 9] [a b] [c d] [e f] }
> >
> So what about RAID 1+5?
1+5 is somewhat of a meaningless combination. I can think of no
rational reason for doing it.
You could do 5+0, and this is indeed sometimes used.
--
========== Fight Back! It may not be just YOUR life at risk. ==========
alaric at caerllewys.net : phil-stracchino at earthlink.net : phil at novylen.net
phil stracchino : unix ronin : renaissance man : mystic zen biker geek
2000 CBR929RR, 1991 VFR750F3 (foully murdered), 1986 VF500F (sold)
Linux Now! ...Friends don't let friends use Microsoft.
More information about the geeks
mailing list