[geeks] This is bad but tempting

[N. Miller]

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:57:40 -0500, "Bill Bradford" <mrbill at mrbill.net>
said:
> Am I the only one to whom this screams "SPAM FARM"?
> 

It's occurred to me, that since all of the recent email worms have not
had any destructive payload that they may well be research for 
implementation of a distributed spam system...one in which it's very
difficult to track the spammers since they are not the ones sending
the spam.

Or am I just being paranoid?

=Nadine=

> On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 08:50:44PM +0100, Mike Meredith wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 09:49:58 -0500, Brian Dunbar wrote:
> > > That is, it would be if I were out of work, had a farm of computers
> > > and a broadband connection
> > > 
> > > http://www.virtualmda.com/
> > 
> > Note that you get $1 per hour of CPU time, which will take a long time
> > to acrue seeing as sending emails doesn't take much effort. 
> > _______________________________________________
> > GEEKS:  http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/geeks
> 
> -- 
> bill bradford
> austin texas
> _______________________________________________
> GEEKS:  http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/geeks
-- 
  N. Miller
  vraptor at promessage.com