[geeks] SCO sues IBM (pure UNIX *BSD)
Lionel Peterson
lionel4287 at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 10 06:52:24 CST 2003
--- Jochen Kunz <jkunz at unixag-kl.fh-kl.de> wrote:
> On 2003.03.10 06:10 Koyote wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure I understand how not having bash makes you more pure
> > than having it in the core.
> As Jonathan already stated bash is no real POSIX shell.
No, I think the discussion is that the lack of /bin/sh may make a
distribution "impure", but the presence of bash is not,in adn of
itself, an indication the presence of /bin/sh.
The two are not mutually exclusive, and the original statement seemed
to say that. Bash doesn't "taint" a system with it's mere presence ;^)
=====
Lionel
"Nothing would please me more than being able to hire ten
programmers and deluge the hobby market with good software"
Bill Gates, in "An OpenLetter to Hobbyists" dated February 3, 1976
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
More information about the geeks
mailing list