[geeks] FW: [rescue] UPS Recommendation

[N. Miller]

Yes, it is interesting.  However, "militia" organizations aren't
smart enough to keep their PR from being their own end.

You call it a Civil Defense organization, apply for non-profit 
status and include both ownership of a firearm *and* firearm
training as part of the requirements for membership.  Then you
run civil defense drills and offer your services to the city/town you
live in for disaster response (like a VFD or the like).

There's not really all that much difference between the two, is
there? ;-)  It's all about the spin in the modern world--the sheeple
are not smart enough to look up their own brief facts, much less
read extensively to cipher meaning from "spin".

=Nadine=

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:14 -0400 (EDT), nick at snowman.net said:
> Ahh but if you organize militia meetings about now you get FBI & ATF
> agents trying to ruin your life.  Makes things more intresting does it
> not?
> 	Nick
> 
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:

> > It's quite clear that the intention was that all citizens had the right 
> > to be armed.  Not only that, they had the duty to be armed, but 
> > obviously many people don't have enough sense of duty to even bother 
> > reading.
> > 
> > Even if it were stricly for militia use, there would be little 
> > difference, except maybe we'd organize militia meetings now and then.
> > Effectively, we have to be armed for self-defense in order to be armed 
> > for the militia.  If you are not armed, then it will be a little hard to 
> > organize the militia when it is called up... :)
> > _______________________________________________
> > GEEKS:  http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/geeks
> _______________________________________________
> GEEKS:  http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/geeks
> 
-- 
  N. Miller
  vraptor at promessage.com