[geeks] CCW for Ohio!

[wa2egp at att.net]

> Yes, but how many of those candidates really had a chance of winning.  Perot 
> years back got a big chunk of the popular vote but didn't get any electoral 
> votes IIRC.  Perot pushed pretty hard and had a chance of winning - what chance 
> do you think those other candidates had...


The point was that it has always been more than two parties regardless of
chances of winning.  Unfortunately, the media et al will not allow the other
parties a fair chance.  Candidates have not been invited to a debate since
"they will not get more than 10% of the vote".  They certainly won't now!  It
really sucks.  Even if a candidate would be the worse president even, they
 just might come up with something that is a good idea (or make the other 
candidates squirm).