[geeks] Postscript question
Jonathan C Patschke
jp at celestrion.net
Thu Nov 21 22:05:59 CST 2002
On Thursday, Nov 21, 2002, at 21:56 US/Central, Dave Kimmel wrote:
> It sounds like tar and friends will work properly on a UFS filesystem,
> but
> not an HFS one.
Correct. This makes...some degree of sense, I suppose. Unix tools
(tar/cpio) on a Unix filesystem; Mac tools (Stuffit/ditto) on a Mac
filesystem.
> I'm not sure which scheme I like better since I see some
> disadvantages to both, all of which revolve around the unix half of
> things.
I don't expect that to be a problem for long. HFS metadata are
resource forks are pretty-much deprecated for new applications.
Developers are expected to use bundles and property-lists in new works.
So, three or four years down the road, it won't matter, unless you're
using legacy applications.
> But that's where utilities like ditto come in to play.
Exactly.
> Good to hear. I'll keep ditto in mind if/when I get a Mac.
Make sure you use -rsrcFork, or it'll just copy the data forks. Don't
ask me why the default is so utterly useless.
--
Jonathan C. Patschke
Celestrion Information Systems
Thorndale, TX
More information about the geeks
mailing list