[geeks] FBI vs. bandwidth thieves
Joshua D Boyd
jdboyd at cs.millersville.edu
Thu Jun 27 16:16:55 CDT 2002
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 05:07:31PM -0400, Tim H. wrote:
> OK, I got the link from /. , but I am baffled as to where the FBI gets
> jurisdiction? And for that matter, isn't a violation of a "customer
> service agreement" a civil matter? And how can the FBI seize property
> without charging someone with a crime? I'm not sticking up for the
> people involved, they agreed to the rules, but the FBI?!?!
>
> Is the gov't et.al. so scared of communication by people that everything
> relating to computers/internet is automatically stuffed under some
> terrorism bill or something? I am missing a piece here somewhere, do we
> have somebody in the Toledo area that can fill me in?
>
> http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?Site=TO&Date=20020627&Category=NEWS03&ArtNo=106270073&Ref=AR
They siezed 23 computers and only got a total of 3 harddrives?
Methinks someone quickly stashed the harddrives.
And that is so way lame. The cable company should have just used a
server side bandwidth limiter if they cared so much.
--
Joshua D. Boyd
More information about the geeks
mailing list